in the selection of a topic, we must first verify that the problem is not "falsification", for example,<a href="http://www.peckrealty.com/httpdocs/agents/bottega-veneta-t-1105.html">ボッテガヴェネタ アウトレット</a> http://www.peckrealty.com/httpdocs/agents/bottega-veneta-t-1105.html, some people take "harmony" to argue with you, you will not have to pay attention to, because the problem not falsifiable, how a legitimate all from two film mouth each other say, you called "Sancai people, why only heaven, why take the fall?" People can say "too low, not combined with ya." You can't prove him wrong. So, in the course of the debate first is to test each other's point of view "falsifiability" unfalsifiable statement has no meaning.
[violinist Amy Watson is playing music and cattle. ]
Mathematical problem clear
you are a soldier, commander of the war mobilization said "as long as the charge to run fast, you won't get hurt", you do everything together and rushed out, was badly mutilated to lift the back, you question the company commander, company commander replied "that's because you washed fast enough, otherwise you won't get hurt." You sprayed an one mouthful blood slowly understand, that sentence mobilization commander no potential can be proved wrong possibility, is simply not "falsifiability", the power of interpretation of completely by him, this sentence is always right lie lie. If the mobilization to "as long as the charge speed 5 meters per second, you won't get hurt", which "falsifiability", as long as there are people in charge speed over 5 meters per second is injured, mobilization can prove that the company commander is wrong.
< >
Author
2, the "no" does not need to prove
Internet shortened the distance between people,<a href="http://www.laramiecountyrepublicanparty.com/events/mcm-japan-t-46.html">MCM 店舗</a> http://www.laramiecountyrepublicanparty.com/events/mcm-japan-t-46.html, but did not assimilate the thought of people, network debate smoke, hot topics emerge in an endless stream. But the truth behind the noisy, but emotional release Posts far more than the calm reasonable posts, even try to reason of the post, there is also a lot of logical confusion, so that each word, hard won consensus. Especially the fire everywhere in the micro-blog,, a feather, and random phase clustered the main reason is the lack of capacity of netizen logic. According to years of debate experience I summarized seven debate logic, for your reference.
you say "Ruyi Jingu Bang" exist, I said does not exist, you let me prove it doesn't exist, that I really can't prove, even though I dig three feet to find no, that wouldn't rule out dig four feet to find possible, even though I'm sweating the earth dug over, then you come to a word "will be on Mars?"
published in the science squirrels meeting:
1, a "falsifiability" meaningful
and boundary is different, the reality of life in the "no" is not proof, also don't need to prove, to "no" view of a party can do anything is the default right side, until to "have" view of a party took out "" certificate Ming far. You said that cell phone radiation exists dangerous brain tumor leukemia, I said does not exist, then it's up to you to burden of proof. The global scientific community has done research on the correlation of hundreds of mobile phone radiation brain tumor and leukemia, the conclusion does not support the relevance, you prove "a" can not be established, and my "no" is to set up.
|
