medical reform is not the all people medical such a simple moral goal, it consists of numerous details after the introduction of composition, indeed there are many uncertain factors. On the other hand, it is essentially a welfare reform, and therefore must and Treasury related, people will ask, all state if the spending to increase taxes, or increased is astronomical deficits? From a practical perspective, the more trouble, because now in support of and against public solutions, both in Canada as examples to support himself and attack each other.
Compared with
I think the answer to that question should be background, what is the status of their respective countries? The welfare system is the best countries such as the United Arab Emirates, truly "stinking rich", also on a tax-free,<a href="http://www.penangplace.com/_vti_log/Louis-Vuitton-outlet-5013.html">ルイヴィトン アウトレット</a> http://www.penangplace.com/_vti_log/Louis-Vuitton-outlet-5013.html, behind Europe high welfare also follow high taxes, simply cannot be compared. The characteristics of USA facing society is constantly "large-scale dynamic poverty irrigation": Immigration Everfount and, to most often not rich. So, here is indeed the "award with the fish with fishing" concept to prevail, think it is important to give the opportunity not to give money, only the basic welfare. But, what is the basic welfare, still a lot of controversy. We want to solve one of which long-term welfare, is the national medical insurance. America still has 47000000 people without health insurance, an estimated 25000000 people although have insurance, but because the self paid part difficult to bear and didn't go to see the doctor. Many poor people, new immigrants after the doctor does not pay, cost must stand them in the head, but also one of the causes of rising medical costs.
>
The two presidents
but in fact, is not to say that Obama's plan could easily pass. Because of the large number of people and the centrist Democratic senator, on all government business hesitates, preferring to public-private cooperation in the form of. Some of the recent approval of Obama scheme members, to explain all the public plan in public, be angry mob attacks, and even physical conflict. Democrats said it was a political agitator Republican extremists, also refers to the interest group persuaded. But also must admit,<a href="http://www.paleenconstruction.com/images/paleenmanor/boots-tenpo-t-42.html">ブーツ 通販</a> http://www.paleenconstruction.com/images/paleenmanor/boots-tenpo-t-42.html, first of all, this is a very sensitive topic, related to the vital interests, easily emotional. Recent support Obama scheme of old American Association, there are 60000 member withdraws.
USA welfare system and the European welfare state, can say not to export. So can often hear people ask: two system which is better? Or simply blame: the basic welfare system American is no conscience.
USA welfare system doesn't have a conscience?
overseas Chinese
Obama and Clinton are young and ambitious, have completed the national health care reform as can endure achievement. Though people all think that the present system in need of reform, there are very large differences can be a specific scheme. Obama Te is all the operations of government, met with unanimous Republican opposition. Health care reform will eventually complete different through legislation, Congress and the Clinton era, the degree of support, the Obama era, Democrats and Republicans in the house of Representatives, the ratio is 256 than 178, the Senate is 60 than 40, has the absolute advantage.
|
